Wealth inequality shapes the economic fate of nations and communities alike. From the dawn of income taxation in 1913 to today’s complex debates, policy has been the primary lever for narrowing or widening economic divides. This journey through history reveals both the triumphs and setbacks that inform our current struggles and hopes.
Income inequality first became measurable in the United States around 1915, soon after the Sixteenth Amendment introduced the nation’s first federal income tax in 1913. Those early efforts demonstrated that government intervention could influence the distribution of wealth.
By 1928, the Gini coefficient peaked at 48.9, reflecting the wealthiest one percent of Americans capturing more than a fifth of total income. Industrial titans like the Rockefellers and Carnegies dominated the landscape, accruing vast fortunes, while millions of workers faced economic hardship.
The New Deal era marked the initial pivot toward progressive income taxation and wealth levies, setting precedents for redistribution that would reshape the American economy for decades.
Between 1937 and 1967, income inequality declined dramatically in what scholars call the Great Compression. Progressive tax rates soared to 91% on the highest incomes in the 1950s. At the same time, labor unions expanded, and robust social programs took hold.
During this era, the Gini coefficient drifted into the high 30s, and the pre-tax share of income held by the top 1% sank to its lowest historical levels. By 1975, that share hit 10.9%—a landmark low that reflected dramatic reductions in income inequality fueled by multiple policy levers.
Starting around 1979, the United States entered the Great Divergence. Income inequality climbed steadily, driven by deregulation, globalization, and shifts in corporate compensation toward stock options. The post-1980 era witnessed neoliberal policies accelerating wealth concentration at the very top.
By 2007, the after-tax income share of the top 1% had more than doubled from its late-1970s level, topping 17%. The stock market boom and capital gains were major engines of this growth, with executive pay skyrocketing.
Wealth inequality is not just an American story. At the start of the 20th century, the global top 1% held over half of private wealth. By mid-century, two world wars and high taxation drove the top share down to around 20%, often called the great wealth equalization.
Since the 1980s, however, a reversal has occurred worldwide. Many nations embraced expansive public investments in education and health during their post-war recoveries, only to later adopt market-first policies that widened gaps between the rich and poor.
In the aftermath of the Great Recession and through the Obama administration, policymakers deployed a mix of tax and transfer programs to address inequality. The Affordable Care Act, expanded unemployment insurance, and new taxes on investment income returned some balance.
Looking ahead, a growing toolkit includes proposals for a universal basic income, wealth taxes on fortunes over $50 million, and stronger antitrust enforcement to curb corporate concentration. These measures aim to build on past successes and prevent the erosion of economic opportunity.
Understanding the history of wealth inequality policy reveals critical lessons: bold taxation, robust social programs, and worker empowerment can foster middle-class prosperity across generations. Conversely, unchecked market forces can rapidly undo decades of progress.
The path forward demands coalition building among governments, civil society, and the private sector. By championing public infrastructure and fair wage standards, we can craft policies that balance growth with equity.
As citizens and policymakers, we face a choice. Will we repeat the cycles of rising disparity, or will we commit to systemic reforms that broaden opportunity? The story of wealth inequality is still being written. Together, we can ensure it becomes a tale of shared prosperity rather than one of deepening divides.
References
